What is the difference between radiometric and relative dating

See table 3.8 Using data from table 2 (excluding the Septuagint calculations and including Jones and Ussher), the average date of the creation of the earth is 4045 B. This still yields an average of about 6,000 years for the age of the earth.

Relative dating utilizes six fundamental principles to determine the relative age of a formation or event.

The bone was 68 million years old, and conventional wisdom about fossilization is that all soft tissue, from blood to brains, decomposes.

Only hard parts, like bones and teeth, can become fossils.

Let’s do a rough calculation to show how this works.

When paleontologist Mary Schweitzer found soft tissue in a Tyrannosaurus rex fossil, her discovery raised an obvious question -- how the tissue could have survived so long?Then, by applying the Principle of Cross-Cutting we are able to relatively date those processes.While differences in biblical interpretation or in calculation methodology can produce some differences in the creation date, most results fall relatively close to one of these two dominant models.Patriarchs from Adam to Terah, the father of Abraham, are said to be older by as much as 100 years or more when they begat their named son in the Greek Septuagint than they were in the Latin Vulgate (Genesis 5; Genesis 11) or the Hebrew Tanakh (Gen 5; Gen 11).The net difference between the two major genealogies of Genesis is 1466 years (ignoring the "second year after the flood" ambiguity), 85% of the total difference.These are chemical elements, like carbon or uranium, that are identical except for one key feature -- the number of neutrons in their nucleus.

393

Leave a Reply